Sometimes Reason defends Twitter reflexively. Twitter suspended J.D. Vance's campaign account for "impersonation," for reasons we're never told. The article says it looked illegitimate "at a quick glance," which seems to be Twitter's standard decision-making mechanism.

Twitter has a right to act like a bunch of capricious jerks. That doesn't mean it shouldn't be called out as a bunch of capricious jerks.

@gmcgath Unfortunately, twitter really doesn't have a choice there. The sheer amount of data they must wade through makes anything but superficial decision-making impossible. My complaint is that, if twitter has a sloppy suspension process, it must be backed up by a speedy and accurate appeal process. And they don't have that. (The first step toward proper appeals would be that an appeal automatically reinstates an account while the decision is reconsidered.)

Sign in to participate in the conversation

Liberdon is a Mastodon instance for libertarians, ancaps, anarchists, voluntaryists, agorists, etc to sound off without fear of reprisal from jack or zuck. It was created in the wake of the Great Twitter Cullings of 2018, when a number of prominent libertarian accounts were suspended or banned.